Rivian needed to boost efficiency while simplifying its complex tools for production

my role

Lead product designer through end to end process: discovery, user research, requirements gathering, and design

team

Ashley Putnam, Lead Product Designer
Loan Lu, Product Designer
Michael Powers, Engineering Lead
Caleb Watters, Engineering
Sean Watters, Engineering
Eric Weaser, Project Manager

Laptop on a truck
Communication tools not cutting users any “slack” on changes
Sheet of tasks
Use of references sheets to supplement memory

Learn to make more with less time

After years of testing and preparation, Rivian was ready to produce their vehicles at rapid scale so that everyone could join the electric adventure. To meet demand, manufacturing would have to increase and times would have to be reduced.

The current tools served a purpose, but were no longer sustainable with current and future needs. New tools would have to be built for the users building various software and hardware recipes. The team was challenged to reduce downtime, make the system reliable, and improve the experience in all conditions for the various users

(Key) issues slowing drive

System Latency

Due to system architecture and 3rd party integrations, tools run slowly ultimately affecting production

Indefinite Scroll

Tools created impediments to make quick fixes for firmware updates or module issues

At a Distance

Important interfaces aren't viewable at a distance nor do they contain the correct information for the task at hand

Version Uncontrol

Lack of change management for station updates leads to duplication and errors

Use of manual tools to record information
circle and line diagram

Manufactured for many users

The new tool had to be built for multiple users in multiple modes. Each user interacting with the data on different devices.

Team Members
(Operators)

Perform actions at each station to produce the vehicle

Line
Leader

Oversee activities within their line and take actions if/when necessary

Quality
Engineer

Review results of stations and help determine proper actions and how to improve the process

Manufacturing
Engineer

Build and edit recipes for stations in the factory that will be executed on the terminals

Building a recipe for success

Working with stakeholders and product management, we determined the next steps to address the needs for users responsible for building recipes. On one side, engineers needed a tool to easily view, edit, and publish new station recipes.

Lineside Admin

To power efficiency and speed on the line, manufacturing engineers needed the ability to easy view and edit tasks.

Users can easily view, add, and edit new tasks from this view. They can also change the order of the tasks by dragging and dropping.

Line Balancing

Research showed that users needed a way to view multiple stations at once to view and adjust takt time.

This view allows users to view all tasks and total time for tasks per station. A user can drag tasks to another station and edit them within context.

Version Control

With the need for rapid pace, users needed a way to view and control task list versions.

Putting it on the line

On the flipside of the equation, workers on the line used a touchscreen device that displayed various tasks to be completed.

Lineside Terminal

Recipes built in the Lineside Admin tool are sent to the respective stations along the line. Only information that is important to line workers is displayed such as task names and steps.

When a vehicle enters a station, details about it are visually displayed for the user to confirm. Once ready, the user initiates the list, and completes the task actions.

A timer helps users track their total takt time for the station.

Building a faster, better future

The team faced many challenges throughout the project. EVs are very complex machines composed of many circuits and controllers running on software. The production line had to keep running while new firmware updates were being pushed out. Finding time to test new updates was also tedious.

Overall, we met our initial goals. Our work reduced the total takt time on each station to 2.5 minutes from 4 minutes. This reduction led to higher production and fewer errors that needed to be fixed before a vehicle was given the factory-ok.